<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking to get binoculars to take digital photos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>I agree with Buddy! I have been involved in photography and astronomy for 25+ years! Bushnell digital binoculars are in the lower end binoculars to begin with! and Bushnell has very little to no experience! in digital photography! dont get me wrong, it&#039;s FREE! go for it! they can have a lot of fun! but do not expect high quality! if you want high quality digital binoculars, go for canon&#039;s! sorry to say then run about $500.00 Dollars if I remember right. sorry for The bad news!

Thank You,

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Buddy! I have been involved in photography and astronomy for 25+ years! Bushnell digital binoculars are in the lower end binoculars to begin with! and Bushnell has very little to no experience! in digital photography! dont get me wrong, it&#8217;s FREE! go for it! they can have a lot of fun! but do not expect high quality! if you want high quality digital binoculars, go for canon&#8217;s! sorry to say then run about $500.00 Dollars if I remember right. sorry for The bad news!</p>
<p>Thank You,</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Choose a different prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choose a different prize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcamerabinocularsreview.com/339/looking-to-get-binoculars-to-take-digital-photos/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>&quot;How do I know how many megapixels the binocular camera has?&quot; Sorry to say, but the binocular camera probably does not even have 1 megapixel!!

The term VGA is often used to refer to a resolution of 640×480, regardless of the hardware that produces the picture.

640×480 resolution is equal to 307,200 pixels (less than 1/2 a mega-pixel). This is close to the image quality of a standard definition TV. 500,000 pixels would be about 1/2 a mega-pixel.

This kind of resolution (640×480) is good for emails because the file size is small. You could make small prints but enlargements would look very coarse.

You should not use a camera with less than 2 mega-pixels.

Sources:

I am taking photography/graphic arts at college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How do I know how many megapixels the binocular camera has?&#8221; Sorry to say, but the binocular camera probably does not even have 1 megapixel!!</p>
<p>The term VGA is often used to refer to a resolution of 640×480, regardless of the hardware that produces the picture.</p>
<p>640×480 resolution is equal to 307,200 pixels (less than 1/2 a mega-pixel). This is close to the image quality of a standard definition TV. 500,000 pixels would be about 1/2 a mega-pixel.</p>
<p>This kind of resolution (640×480) is good for emails because the file size is small. You could make small prints but enlargements would look very coarse.</p>
<p>You should not use a camera with less than 2 mega-pixels.</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p>I am taking photography/graphic arts at college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

